For a world free of hazardous chemicals

A catalyst for change

ChemSec - bridging the gap between regulators, business, investors, NGOs and science

Read more...

RoHS to restrict more substances in electronics

Advocating for a strong EU directive on electronics

Time to include brominated and chlorinated flame retardants and PVC in the EU directive

Read more...

Revealing the SIN List producers

REACH reveals the companies behind the SIN List chemicals

- building on data from REACH registrations recently been made publicly available by ECHA

Read more...

”The SIN List is a major driver for innovation”

European Commission: The SIN List is a major driver for innovation

States the European Commission in their "Thematic studies for Review of REACH 2012"

Read more...

Financial investors taking action

Sustainable investments avoiding hazardous chemicals

Concrete tools for investors wanting to avoid the risks of investing in high concern chemicals

Read more...

Endocrine disrupting chemicals

Time to regulate the use of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Lets move from ambition to action: It is time to regulate the use of endocrine disrupting chemicals

Read more...

Information about the SIN List in Chinese

为何需要采用【慎·名单】

Making it easier for Chinese companies and authorities to use the SIN List

Read more...

Second Opinion on the SIN List

Technical University of Denmark has, on behalf of the Swedish Water & Wastewater Association, conducted a second opinion on the SIN List. The recommendation made by the Technical University of Denmark is to not exclude any substances from the SIN List since no substance could “truly be exempted from being hazardous”.

The aim of the study Second opinion on the hazards associated with the substances selected for the REACH SIN* List 1.0 is to evaluate the human and environmental hazards associated with the substances listed on the SIN List 1.0 and the main question asked is: “Is there any chance that one or more of them should be excluded from the list due to lack of hazardous properties?”


The Department of Environmental Engineering at Technical University of Denmark has evaluated the SIN List 1.0 from a water perspective - each of the substances on the list has been evaluated against the European Water Framework Directive list and the World Health Organization’s drinking water quality guidelines. The substances on the SIN List 1.0 has also been assessed for their carcinogenic, mutagenic and reprotoxic properties. In addition, the Ranking and Identification of Chemical Hazards (RICH)-tool has been applied, which assesses the inherent properties including environmental fate and toxicity in order to identify substances with potential environmental hazards.

After a full assessment of all substances on the SIN List with regard to their hazardous properties, the researchers concluded that none of the 267 substances listed on the SIN List 1.0 could be excluded due to lack of hazardous properties, including all 30 equivalent concern substances.

 

Full report “Second opinion on the hazards associated with the substances selected for the REACH SIN* List 1.0”